[patch] Request for review - X509 Issuer Altname handling

[Simon Josefsson]

Brad Hards <bradh at frogmouth.net> writes:

> I've updated the patch to include the self-test. It is otherwise unchanged.

Thank you!  It looks fine except one nit:

The code duplication between print_san and print_ian worries me, and the
print_san code has been changed since you made the patch so they are not
in sync with your patch.  Could you instead generalize print_san into a
print_an function that takes an additional parameter indicating whether
it is printing a SAN or IAN?

With that change, it is ready to go in.

/Simon