[patch] Request for review - X509 Issuer Altname handling

Brad Hards bradh at frogmouth.net
Fri Sep 4 12:04:42 CEST 2009

On Friday 07 August 2009 01:14:46 Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Brad Hards <bradh at frogmouth.net> writes:
> > This patch (which I submit as a request for review / feedback) implements
> > support for getting issuer altname. It is based on the equivalent subject
> > altname code.
> It looks fine to me.  I wonder why that have been missing...  The
> self-test x509_altname was missing from your patch though?
> > [I'll submit it again for incorporation after my papers get worked
> > through]
I got the confirmation on my papers today.

I've updated the patch to include the self-test. It is otherwise unchanged.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: x509_issuer_altname-2009-09-04.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 15101 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20090904/85c9269a/attachment.bin>

More information about the Gnutls-devel mailing list