GnuPG 2.4.4 still using legacy packets?

[Robert J. Hansen]

> This backhanded snark is unbecoming of you, Bruce. The authors of 
> RFC9580 are named individuals - three of whom currently work on PGP 
> software, and one of those (Niibe) works on GnuPG. Your insinuation that 
> RFC9580 was written by shadowy, disinterested figures is an insult to 
> its authors, and you should consider issuing an apology.

Thank you, Andrew, for being the first to say this, and to do it in a 
gentlemanly way.

I completely agree with Andrew.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 236 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/attachments/20251111/d7e5f7bf/attachment.sig>