OT: Best way to send e-mails to a recipient that does know encryption

[Ingo Klöcker]

On Dienstag, 2. Januar 2024 12:16:15 CET LuKaRo wrote:
> > I do not want to use Gmail to send that kind of informations and I'm
> > comtemplating using posteo.de.
> > 
> > Is this any better?
> 
> I'd argue of course it's better. Google openly admits reading your
> e-mail, so other mail providers that respect your privacy should be
> preferred. I particularly like posteo.de, because the 1€/month fee is
> still very cheap but makes clear that they have a different business
> model that doesn't involve customer data. Furthermore, they deploy a
> very sophisticated solution that makes it technically impossible to
> match payment data or IP addresses to mailboxes, and even fought (and
> won!) a lawsuit against the German authorities that wanted to force
> posteo to hand out customer data (which they don't even collect).

Posteo will release data to authorities if they are forced to do so by a 
judicial order. See their transparency reports for details:
https://posteo.de/en/site/transparency_report

I'm still using Posteo.

Regards,
Ingo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/attachments/20240102/1dd94b56/attachment-0001.sig>