preferring --check-sigs over --list-sigs [was: Re: Houston, we have a problem]

[Stefan Claas]

Am 27.09.2017 um 20:24 schrieb Daniel Kahn Gillmor:

> On Wed 2017-09-27 10:10:54 +0100, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
>> On 26/09/17 20:39, Werner Koch wrote:
>>> Unfortunately the man pages describes --list-sigs in detail and only in
>>> the next paragraph --check-sigs is explained in terms of --list-sigs.
>>> it might be better to merge them into one description with a focus on
>>> --check-sigs.
>> Or just describe --check-sigs and have --list-sigs tucked away in an
>> "experts only, beware" section.
> I've noted this as https://dev.gnupg.org/T3430
>
>       --dkg
>
Now i have a problem lol... with my new pub key and --check-sigs.

My new pub key 3BB27531899F06EA4582B2E9D68B6EAC6ECF3AB6 was signed
by Governikus 864E8B951ECFC04AF2BB233E5E5CCCB4A4BF43D7 and when doing
a --check-sigs i get an error...under Windows 7 and gpg4win GnuPG 2.2.1, 
which i just
downloaded... Therfore i checked other users, which have a Governikus 
sig3 and
the error persists. Any ideas gentlemen?

Regards
Stefan