preferring --check-sigs over --list-sigs [was: Re: Houston, we have a problem]

[Daniel Kahn Gillmor]

On Wed 2017-09-27 10:10:54 +0100, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> On 26/09/17 20:39, Werner Koch wrote:
>> Unfortunately the man pages describes --list-sigs in detail and only in
>> the next paragraph --check-sigs is explained in terms of --list-sigs.
>> it might be better to merge them into one description with a focus on
>> --check-sigs.
>
> Or just describe --check-sigs and have --list-sigs tucked away in an
> "experts only, beware" section.

I've noted this as https://dev.gnupg.org/T3430

     --dkg