Why OpenPGP is not wanted - stupid is in vogue right now
Melvin Carvalho
melvincarvalho at gmail.com
Tue Jun 11 21:06:39 CEST 2013
On 10 June 2013 10:46, Henry Hertz Hobbit <hhhobbit at securemecca.net> wrote:
> My personal observations agrees with Rob Hansen's studies 100%.
> Even when required to use encryption people hate doing it and
> their concept is entirely focused on the ciphering with them
> thinking that people who use encryption are trying to hide
> something. They don't even begin to understand that signing is
> also a part of encryption. IOW, there is also an ignorance
> factor. Nobody but me uses my signatures on the stuff I
> deliver. It isn't because my keys aren't part of the WOT. It
> is because for what ever reason they want to complain like mad
> about Prism but then go to Facebook and broadcast their personal
> lives to the entire world. Why? I would like to say I don't
> know why and that it could be used for a doctoral dissertation
> but I am beginning to suspect the doctoral candidates in
> Sociology and Psychology will be similarly nuts any more. For
> those few who use my stuff they don't even use the signatures to
> verify that things are okay.. Dumb? Certainly. But stupid is
> in vogue right now and I don't know why. The Mayan Haab
> (365 days per cycle) and Tz'olkin (260 days per cycle)
> calendars both go backwards and forwards forever but nobody
> wants to know that these calendars really didn't come to an
> end on 21 Decembre 2012 and that was just one of the times
> that the first days align. It also happens every 52 Haab
> cycles (years) and 73 Tz'olkin periods. Don't try to sit down
> and explain it to them either. They go glassy eyed and make
> sure they don't understand that (365 * 52) = (260 * 73) and
> make sure they don't understand why even when you show the
> reduction that is lowest number you can get in the
> multiplication where they are equal. They want to say that
> it is completely impossible to understand and they want to
> believe what ever lies are told on the History II channel and
> elsewhere. They get away with it because everybody else is
> doing the same thing. Why? BEING STUPID IS IN FASHION RIGHT
> NOW!
>
> If they had complained that my keys were not part of the WOT, my
> keys would have been part of the WOT in a hurry. That was why I
> added my legal name as a comment. I anticipated somebody would
> ask me to become part of the WOT. Nobody has asked because less
> than 1/10 of 1% of people are using encryption except when they
> don't know that they are using it (443).
>
> What is wrong with the GUI provided with GPG4WIN? I really don't
> want a GUI on Linux since I do most things in a terminal and BASH
> anyway. My only complaint with GPG4WIN is that checking the
> signature should come first but that is because that is what I
> use it for. I verify that my own downloads have not been tampered
> with. Hey, the web-server isn't under my control. I can no longer
> send email on the POP email account that goes with that web server
> any more either. Yahoo's SMTP server stopped accepting my email
> from Thunderbird just two days ago. Unfortunately, POP still
> pulls down 100 or so messages from PeskySpammer every day. That
> does not instill confidence. But I can still mail fine here using
> OpenPGP on 1and1 with no problems. So it is not my setup which has
> not changed that is causing the problems. Business mail at Yahoo is
> either broken or the NSA / FBI retaliated for my comment at WaPo.
> I pick broken. Why retaliate when even some of them will agree with
> my comments at WaPo? My snail mail delivered letter to Yahoo will be
> my last chance at getting it working again. My hope is extremely
> low.
>
> Until stupid falls out of vogue, encryption just isn't going to
> be used. If the History II channel and my downstairs neighbor
> with Planet X (Nibiru) are any indication we will need a
> completely new generation for that to happen. This generation
> is so stupid with their iPhones and iPads and Galaxy Samsungs
> that I am beginning to wonder how we got here. It isn't just
> the young doing it either. Many older people have been similarly
> afflicted. I think I will watch the programs on the D-Day veterans
> so I can get out of this time warp factor we are in right now for
> a while. Those people back then weren't stupid. They cracked the
> Enigma, the Lorenz, and most of the Japanese codes as well. I
> should have lived my life back then with my half-sister Susie and
> helped in the cracking. Now? The emperor has no clothes and
> almost nobody wants to use encryption - ANY KIND OF ENCRYPTION!
>
> Me? My financial data and passwords are enciphered. I don't
> make any apologies either. There are too many hackers that
> want to steal that stuff. I strongly avoid using software
> that isn't signed unless I created it either. The people
> that aren't doing it? THEY ARE PROUD ABOUT BEING STUPID!
> The reason Microsoft bundled Windows Defender and have it
> on by default is because well over 50% of the people weren't
> using an AV product on Windows. Unfortunately, Windows
> Defender is removing all blocked entries including even
> Facebook and bad hosts from the hosts file now. Again,
> stupid is in fasion even at Microsoft when they attempt
> to remedy a problem. Windows Defender may have removed
> the only thing that would keep that problem away from
> that person's computer. Will the Microsoft programmers
> understand that? NO! STUPID IS IN VOGUE RIGHT NOW!
>
> Mucking around with a new GUI for GnuPG will not change
> these factors. The new GUI design needs to be driven by
> what the people want. Right now they don't want
> encryption. Encryption has become a dirty word in their
> diseased minds.
>
Try this:
http://xkcd.com/1181/
It's not about stupidity, it's about incentives.
>
> HHH
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users at gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20130611/5e1699b7/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list