Problems building gpgmepy 2.0 against gnupg 2.5.20

[Ingo Klöcker]

On Freitag, 22. Mai 2026 07:49:13 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit Meik Michalke 
via Gnupg-devel wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2026, 18:37:19 CEST schrieb Andreas Metzler:
> > why is this patch tagged with "Forwarded: not-needed"?
> 
> to be honest, i can't recall. when i saw funda's email i remembered i've
> seen that issue before and discussed it with people. it could be the result
> of gnupg 2.5 still being in development at that time and the patch was seen
> as a temporary measure, combined with noone feeling responsible to maintain
> the python package back then.
> 
> i fully agree this should be fixed upstream.

I've now done this.

Regards,
Ingo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 265 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/attachments/20260722/897d472b/attachment.sig>