GPGME: Signature summary
Werner Koch
wk at gnupg.org
Thu Oct 15 21:37:28 CEST 2009
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:32, mat69 at gmx.net said:
> I do a verification of a file and what baffles me is the summary of the
> signature. If I use a wrong file it correctly outputs
> GPGME_SIGSUM_RED, yet if
There are a couple of reasons for this. I took this opportunity to
write a litte test program which prints almost all information we get
back from a signature verification. Maybe the output will be helpful.
$ ./run-verify foo.sig foo
Original file name: [none]
Signature 0
status ....: Success
summary ...: valid green
fingerprint: 7B96D396E6471601754BE4DB53B620D01CE0C630
created ...: 1255634851
expires ...: 0
validity ..: full
val.reason : Success
pubkey algo: 1
digest algo: 2
pka address: [none]
pka trust .: n/a
other flags:
notations .: no
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Auschnahme regelt ein Bundeschgesetz.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: run-verify.c
Type: text/x-csrc
Size: 6696 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20091015/dc5e7147/attachment.c>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: run-support.h
Type: text/x-chdr
Size: 4624 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20091015/dc5e7147/attachment.h>
More information about the Gnupg-devel
mailing list