[gnutls-help] libgnutls undefined reference

[Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos]

On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 18:28 +0200, Anton wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have already built nettle with secp192 and secp224 curves support.
> It was wrong decision and I should consider secp192 and secp224 
> curves as insecure?

I do not believe that the Fedora/RHEL decision not to include secp192
and secp224 was related to security. Given today's situation though
supporting the 192 and 224 curves doesn't provide much of an advantage.

regards,
Nikos