From gp at familiehaase.de  Fri Sep 17 00:05:15 2004
From: gp at familiehaase.de (Gerrit P. Haase)
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 00:05:15 +0200
Subject: [Help-gnutls] cannot build outside the source directory
Message-ID: <1181369777.20040917000515@familiehaase.de>

 gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/ftproot/pub/gnome/gnutls/gnutls-1.0.20/lib -I.. -I../libextra -Iminitasn1/ -I../libextra/openpgp/ -I../libextra/opencdk -Ix509/ -I../includes -I/usr/include -I/usr/include -g0 -O3 -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -O2 -finline-functions -pipe -MT gnutls_handshake.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/gnutls_handshake.Tpo -c /ftproot/pub/gnome/gnutls/gnutls-1.0.20/lib/gnutls_handshake.c  -o .libs/gnutls_handshake.o
/ftproot/pub/gnome/gnutls/gnutls-1.0.20/lib/gnutls_handshake.c:49:21: ext_srp.h: No such file or directory
make[3]: *** [gnutls_handshake.lo] Error 1

$ find . -name "ext_srp.h"
./gnutls-1.0.20/libextra/ext_srp.h

This are the bad INCLUDE flags:

-I.. -I../libextra -Iminitasn1/ -I../libextra/openpgp/ -I../libextra/opencdk -Ix509/ -I../includes

Please use no relative paths, use full paths like this in your
Makefile.am:
INCLUDES = -I$(top_srcdir)/libextra -I$(top_srcdir)/lib/minitasn1/ -I$(top_srcdir)/libextra/openpgp/ -I$(top_srcdir)/libextra/opencdk -I$(top_srcdir)/lib/x509/ -I$(top_srcdir)/includes $(LIBOPENCDK_CFLAGS) $(LIBTASN1_CFLAGS) $(LIBGCRYPT_CFLAGS)


Why do you force the user to build inside the source tree?
Do you build inside the source tree?  Why???


Gerrit
-- 
=^..^=





From jas at extundo.com  Fri Sep 17 00:37:31 2004
From: jas at extundo.com (Simon Josefsson)
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 00:37:31 +0200
Subject: [Help-gnutls] Re: cannot build outside the source directory
References: <1181369777.20040917000515@familiehaase.de>
Message-ID: <ilullf9kfh0.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>

"Gerrit P. Haase" <gp at familiehaase.de> writes:

>  gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/ftproot/pub/gnome/gnutls/gnutls-1.0.20/lib -I.. -I../libextra -Iminitasn1/ -I../libextra/openpgp/ -I../libextra/opencdk -Ix509/ -I../includes -I/usr/include -I/usr/include -g0 -O3 -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -O2 -finline-functions -pipe -MT gnutls_handshake.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/gnutls_handshake.Tpo -c /ftproot/pub/gnome/gnutls/gnutls-1.0.20/lib/gnutls_handshake.c  -o .libs/gnutls_handshake.o
> /ftproot/pub/gnome/gnutls/gnutls-1.0.20/lib/gnutls_handshake.c:49:21: ext_srp.h: No such file or directory
> make[3]: *** [gnutls_handshake.lo] Error 1
>
> $ find . -name "ext_srp.h"
> ./gnutls-1.0.20/libextra/ext_srp.h
>
> This are the bad INCLUDE flags:
>
> -I.. -I../libextra -Iminitasn1/ -I../libextra/openpgp/ -I../libextra/opencdk -Ix509/ -I../includes
>
> Please use no relative paths, use full paths like this in your
> Makefile.am:
> INCLUDES = -I$(top_srcdir)/libextra -I$(top_srcdir)/lib/minitasn1/ -I$(top_srcdir)/libextra/openpgp/ -I$(top_srcdir)/libextra/opencdk -I$(top_srcdir)/lib/x509/ -I$(top_srcdir)/includes $(LIBOPENCDK_CFLAGS) $(LIBTASN1_CFLAGS) $(LIBGCRYPT_CFLAGS)
>
>
> Why do you force the user to build inside the source tree?
> Do you build inside the source tree?  Why???

Hello, and thanks for the report.  I believe this has been fixed in
the development branch.  If you need it fixed in the stable branch
too, please send a (tested) patch to speed up the process.

Thanks,
Simon





From gp at familiehaase.de  Fri Sep 17 01:42:55 2004
From: gp at familiehaase.de (Gerrit P. Haase)
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 01:42:55 +0200
Subject: [Help-gnutls] Re: cannot build outside the source directory
In-Reply-To: <ilullf9kfh0.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
References: <1181369777.20040917000515@familiehaase.de>
	<ilullf9kfh0.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
Message-ID: <114477797.20040917014255@familiehaase.de>

Hello Simon,


nice to meet you;)

>> Why do you force the user to build inside the source tree?
>> Do you build inside the source tree?  Why???

> Hello, and thanks for the report.  I believe this has been fixed in
> the development branch.  If you need it fixed in the stable branch
> too, please send a (tested) patch to speed up the process.

Ok, a patch against the currenty release tarball is attached.  I
compiledand installed outside the source directory with this patch
applied.  I have not done much testing of the binaries, but sionce
here only the build procedure is affected, I think it should be ok.


Gerrit
-- 
=^..^=
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: gnutls-1.0.20.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 5653 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20040917/880e6121/attachment.obj>

From gp at familiehaase.de  Fri Sep 17 02:38:29 2004
From: gp at familiehaase.de (Gerrit P. Haase)
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 02:38:29 +0200
Subject: [Help-gnutls] Re: cannot build outside the source directory
In-Reply-To: <114477797.20040917014255@familiehaase.de>
References: <1181369777.20040917000515@familiehaase.de>
	<ilullf9kfh0.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
	<114477797.20040917014255@familiehaase.de>
Message-ID: <451099384.20040917023829@familiehaase.de>

Hallo Gerrit,

Am Freitag, 17. September 2004 um 01:42 schriebst du:

> Hello Simon,


> nice to meet you;)

>>> Why do you force the user to build inside the source tree?
>>> Do you build inside the source tree?  Why???

>> Hello, and thanks for the report.  I believe this has been fixed in
>> the development branch.  If you need it fixed in the stable branch
>> too, please send a (tested) patch to speed up the process.

> Ok, a patch against the currenty release tarball is attached.  I
> compiledand installed outside the source directory with this patch
> applied.  I have not done much testing of the binaries, but sionce
> here only the build procedure is affected, I think it should be ok.


Hmm, what is interesting about the patch is, that libgnutls-openssl
doesn't need to include libcrypto for the link, I wonder why there is
'openssl' in the name. 


Gerrit
-- 
=^..^=






From jas at extundo.com  Fri Sep 17 11:16:22 2004
From: jas at extundo.com (Simon Josefsson)
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 11:16:22 +0200
Subject: [Help-gnutls] Re: cannot build outside the source directory
References: <1181369777.20040917000515@familiehaase.de>
	<ilullf9kfh0.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
	<114477797.20040917014255@familiehaase.de>
Message-ID: <ilubrg5jlw9.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>

"Gerrit P. Haase" <gp at familiehaase.de> writes:

> Hello Simon,
>
>
> nice to meet you;)
>
>>> Why do you force the user to build inside the source tree?
>>> Do you build inside the source tree?  Why???
>
>> Hello, and thanks for the report.  I believe this has been fixed in
>> the development branch.  If you need it fixed in the stable branch
>> too, please send a (tested) patch to speed up the process.
>
> Ok, a patch against the currenty release tarball is attached.  I
> compiledand installed outside the source directory with this patch
> applied.  I have not done much testing of the binaries, but sionce
> here only the build procedure is affected, I think it should be ok.

There were some unrelated changes in your patch that added
-no-undefined to LDFLAGS, so I improved the development branch and
back ported it.  I'll roll a release candidate eventually, so you can
test it, or you could try CVS.

Thanks,
Simon





From gp at familiehaase.de  Fri Sep 17 11:41:03 2004
From: gp at familiehaase.de (Gerrit P. Haase)
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 11:41:03 +0200
Subject: [Help-gnutls] Re: cannot build outside the source directory
In-Reply-To: <ilubrg5jlw9.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
References: <1181369777.20040917000515@familiehaase.de>
	<ilullf9kfh0.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
	<114477797.20040917014255@familiehaase.de>
	<ilubrg5jlw9.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
Message-ID: <1825570344.20040917114103@familiehaase.de>

Hello Simon,

>> Ok, a patch against the currenty release tarball is attached.  I
>> compiledand installed outside the source directory with this patch
>> applied.  I have not done much testing of the binaries, but sionce
>> here only the build procedure is affected, I think it should be ok.

> There were some unrelated changes in your patch that added
> -no-undefined to LDFLAGS, so I improved the development branch and
> back ported it.  I'll roll a release candidate eventually, so you can
> test it, or you could try CVS.

The -no-undefined flags should do no harm if you have the required
libraries in place since they are needed to test the binaries anyway.
Generally I think adding -no-undefined to all shared library builds
leads to fewer errors, i.e. when a package should be portable across
several platforms.


Gerrit
-- 
=^..^=























From jas at extundo.com  Fri Sep 17 12:09:32 2004
From: jas at extundo.com (Simon Josefsson)
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 12:09:32 +0200
Subject: [Help-gnutls] Re: cannot build outside the source directory
References: <1181369777.20040917000515@familiehaase.de>
	<ilullf9kfh0.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
	<114477797.20040917014255@familiehaase.de>
	<ilubrg5jlw9.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
	<1825570344.20040917114103@familiehaase.de>
Message-ID: <ilu656djjfn.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>

"Gerrit P. Haase" <gp at familiehaase.de> writes:

> Hello Simon,
>
>>> Ok, a patch against the currenty release tarball is attached.  I
>>> compiledand installed outside the source directory with this patch
>>> applied.  I have not done much testing of the binaries, but sionce
>>> here only the build procedure is affected, I think it should be ok.
>
>> There were some unrelated changes in your patch that added
>> -no-undefined to LDFLAGS, so I improved the development branch and
>> back ported it.  I'll roll a release candidate eventually, so you can
>> test it, or you could try CVS.
>
> The -no-undefined flags should do no harm if you have the required
> libraries in place since they are needed to test the binaries anyway.
> Generally I think adding -no-undefined to all shared library builds
> leads to fewer errors, i.e. when a package should be portable across
> several platforms.

I'll look into adding it.

Btw, daily snapshots of GnuTLS should now be available from:

http://josefsson.org/daily/gnutls/

Thanks,
Simon