[gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | mem: define symbol aliases for memory allocation functions (!2033)

[Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities]

Merge request https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2033 was reviewed by Alexander Sosedkin

--
  
Alexander Sosedkin started a new discussion on lib/libgnutls.map: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2033#note_2872594342

 >  	gnutls_audit_pop_context;
 >  	gnutls_audit_current_context;
 > +	gnutls_secure_malloc;

why is it in the `GNUTLS_3_8_6` -- `GNUTLS_3_8_11` section? shouldn't it get split up into more of them?

--
  
Alexander Sosedkin started a new discussion on devel/symbols.last: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2033#note_2872594366

 >  gnutls_bye at GNUTLS_3_4
 > -gnutls_calloc at GNUTLS_3_4
 > +gnutls_calloc@(GNUTLS_3_4)

do I understand correctly that the parentheses are an artifact of `objdump -T` output, signifying it's not a default version of the symbol? do we want it reflected in this file or do we want them stripped maybe?

--
  
Alexander Sosedkin started a new discussion on lib/mem.c: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2033#note_2872594389

 > - * gnutls_global_set_mem_functions().
 > + * This function should be used to deallocate memory if the library
 > + * allocate it.

s/allocate/allocates/

--
  
Alexander Sosedkin started a new discussion on devel/libgnutls.abignore: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2033#note_2872594412

 >  [suppress_function]
 >  name = gnutls_psk_allocate_server_credentials2
 > +

the order of commits seems backwards to me, is it only merge commits that are supposed to be testable?


-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2033
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-devel/attachments/20251106/cab9ed70/attachment-0001.html>