[gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | New CI runner with clang combined ubsan+asan (!1151)

[Development of GNU's TLS library]

Tim Rühsen commented on a discussion on lib/hello_ext.c: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/merge_requests/1151#note_276085450

>  	int ret;
>  	hello_ext_ctx_st ctx;
>  
> -	msg &= GNUTLS_EXT_FLAG_SET_ONLY_FLAGS_MASK;
> +	msg &= (gnutls_ext_flags_t) GNUTLS_EXT_FLAG_SET_ONLY_FLAGS_MASK;

No - we need enum type safety here. `gnutls_ext_flags_t` is a collection of some single bit values. `GNUTLS_EXT_FLAG_SET_ONLY_FLAGS_MASK` is *not* a `gnutls_ext_flags_t`. Since an enum has no fixed type (every compiler is free to use any integer type, signed or unsigned), we'll either need this cast *or* we have to make `GNUTLS_EXT_FLAG_SET_ONLY_FLAGS_MASK` a `gnutls_ext_flags_t`.

I chose the first possibility. If you like the second possibility more, I can change it (but fear it will become even more strange). Using unsigned int for `msg` doesn't really help here.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/merge_requests/1151#note_276085450
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-devel/attachments/20200123/49e8df8f/attachment.html>