[gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | Datum.c cleanup (!1002)

[Development of GNU's TLS library]

> For this particular problem what about eliminating the allocation completely? It seems unnecessary and a patch is attached.

That is good.

> Nevertheless, in the general change, are you confident with this version that other uses do not rely on the old behavior?

How confident can you be ? If someone relies on undocumented side-effects of a function, then ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/merge_requests/1002#note_174870499
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-devel/attachments/20190527/afa7a810/attachment.html>