[gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | UB detected, but test suite stays silent (#878)

[Development of GNU's TLS library]

Tim Rühsen commented:


Not sure about differences between gcc and clang here. By tendency, clang is more advanced than gcc regarding sanitizers (from what I read).

But the main issue (IMO) is that UBSAN doesn't abort/error by default. Hmm, we already have -fno-sanitize-recover... Ah, we don't run the tests in `fuzz/` at all (runner asan.Fedora.x86_64).

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/issues/878#note_262457263
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-devel/attachments/20191218/d2632683/attachment.html>