[gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | fuzzer: added fuzzers for gnutls_ext_raw_parse() [ci skip] (!1133)

[Development of GNU's TLS library]

Tim Rühsen commented:


> Would it be ok for a reasonable/effective fuzzer?

Yes, definitely. Having three calls (with different flags) in a single fuzzer is even better in this case, IMO (less/shared corpora, less code, same results/coverage).

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/merge_requests/1133#note_261809547
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-devel/attachments/20191217/8feaccae/attachment.html>