[gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | TPM fixes (!792)

[Development of GNU's TLS library]

Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos commented on a discussion on lib/tpm.c:

>  {
>  	CHECK_INIT;
>  
> +	if (!srk_password)

In the corresponding case for PKCS#11, we can pass the password/pin via the URI itself (e.g., by the ?pin-value option). In the tpmkey URI we didn't have such a provision. @dwmw2 is considering revising the spec for TPM2.0 though; would it make sense to have such a provision added?

That wouldn't address the issue soon enough though. Any better ideas welcome. In the meantime would it make sense to split the fixes to #600 and #601 into different MRs?

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/merge_requests/792#note_114691010
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-devel/attachments/20181105/597bdf06/attachment.html>