[gnutls-devel] GnuTLS | CONTRIBUTING.md: added proposal on commenting style and new features (!816)

[Development of GNU's TLS library]

I recently had a discussion in the libpsl project that made me investigate and check the C99 spec (and additional clarifications). A leading underscore is reserved except for function local scope (e.g. variable names within a function may have a leading underscore).

Personally, I use leading _ for (static) file local identifiers (functions and variables) in almost all my code. There never was a 'conflict' or something... but who knows for the future. Even static analyzers as lgtm.com don't complain about such identifiers. So I mention it here just for completeness.

Else, LGTM.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/merge_requests/816#note_125740409
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-devel/attachments/20181218/334f1efe/attachment-0001.html>