suggested doc & comment improvements for gnutls

Patrick Pelletier code at
Tue Jan 24 20:21:50 CET 2012

On Dec 28, 2011, at 5:57 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:

> Very nice work thank you! I've applied your patch through github,  
> but sending
> the output files of format-patch is also ok (and even better).

I have a new round of doc fixes I'd like to submit.  Some typos again,  
and I also noticed a lot of comments which still referenced gcrypt, as  
well as a comment which mentions extra.h, which I believe no longer  

I've attempted to use "git format-patch" this time.  I've just  
attached the output file created by "git format-patch" as an  
attachment to this message.  I get the impression I'm not really  
supposed to use it this way, and should instead be using "git send- 
email", but I was a bit overwhelmed by the options of "git send- 
email", and my initial experiments with it didn't work the way I  
expected it would.

(Sorry for my lack of competence with git-format-patch/git-send- 
email.  I've been using git at work for years, but I've never used its  
email features before, and as with other aspects of git, the learning  
curve is a bit steep.)


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Fix-up-some-typos-and-obsolete-comments.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 6113 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20120124/2382e9ce/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------

More information about the Gnutls-devel mailing list