[gnutls-devel] GNUTLS is not going anywhere

Eli Zaretskii eliz at gnu.org
Fri Dec 14 14:18:27 CET 2012

> From: Werner Koch <wk at gnupg.org>
> Cc: nmav at gnutls.org,  karl at gnu.org,  gnutls-devel at lists.gnutls.org,  rms at gnu.org,  johns at gnu.org
> Organisation: g10 Code GmbH
> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 22:09:36 +0100
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:52, eliz at gnu.org said:
> >> I can't speak for Nikos, but there are pretty obvious reasons knowable
> >> to all GNU maintainers.
> >
> > I doubt that "obvious" and "knowable to all" are appropriate here,
> > since you explain below the relevant discussions were closed.
> I wrote "knowable to all GNU maintainers".

Yes, that's what I meant.

> > I'm not.  Being subscribed there is a privilege, not an obligation.
> GNU maintainers are expected to be subscribed to gnu-prog-discuss; well
> at least to the read-only gnu-prog list.
> > Sorry, but since these were closed discussions, I really cannot say
> > anything intelligent about them.  I'm surprised that you expect me to
> > know their contents somehow.
> It is yet another example of the GNU project's management deficit that
> not all maintainers are aware of that list.

I don't know how you arrive at that conclusion.  For the record: they
suggested to subscribe me, I said no thanks.  End of story.  If this
is evidence about something or someone, it's about me, not about the
GNU project.

More information about the Gnutls-devel mailing list