[sr #107822] Testing 3.0.2 on AIX
INVALID.NOREPLY at gnu.org
Fri Sep 30 12:15:56 CEST 2011
Follow-up Comment #13, sr #107822 (project gnutls):
If I could choose I would try to program more defensive!
First I would define RESUME_FALSE 0 because that is what I would expect from
Also that would if calloc'ed buffer is used default would be not resuming.
Then I would make all comparisons session->internals.resumed == RESUME_FALSE
or session->internals.resumed != RESUME_FALSE
agains the value defined as 0. In your case RESUME_TRUE, if suggested above
In K&R they state that the behaviour of bit fields are implementation
specefic. (Code Defensive)
Does that make any sense?
Reply to this item at:
Message sent via/by Savannah
More information about the Gnutls-devel