rfc5081bis

[Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos]

On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
<dkg at fifthhorseman.net> wrote:

> OK, and what is the current consensus of that WG about 5081bis?  can you
> give me some pointers to discussion to read?  I only just subscribed to
> the TLS WG today, and the recent archives are understandably flooded
> with dealing with mitigation of the renegotiation flaw.
For RFC5081bis there wasn't any discussion since it was independent
submission. You can find discussion about the old RFC5081 at
http://www.imc.org/ietf-tls/mail-archive/mail12.html
and over older at:
http://www.imc.org/ietf-tls/mail-archive/mail16.html

> got it, thanks.  i'm looking it over now.  any reason to believe that
> the source itself should not be public?  If i was going to take this
> over and drive it, are there any licensing/copyright concerns i would
> need to be aware of?

No not really, i just sent it in personal to reduce data on list.

regards,
Nikos