[patch] Request for review - X509 Issuer Altname handling

[Simon Josefsson]

Brad Hards <bradh at frogmouth.net> writes:

> Hi,
>
> This patch (which I submit as a request for review / feedback) implements 
> support for getting issuer altname. It is based on the equivalent subject 
> altname code.

It looks fine to me.  I wonder why that have been missing...  The
self-test x509_altname was missing from your patch though?

> [I'll submit it again for incorporation after my papers get worked through]

Please do, otherwise I'm likely to forget about it.

/Simon