Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?
    Simon Josefsson 
    simon at josefsson.org
       
    Tue Sep  9 14:30:48 CEST 2008
    
    
  
RMS asked if there are is reason GnuTLS should remain LGPLv2.1+ instead
of using LGPLv3+.
The reasons I'm familiar with includes lynx under GPLv2-only.  Gnucash
is also said to contain GPLv2-only code.
Are there other reasons not to use LGPLv3+?
I recall hearing about policies that mandate LGPLv2.1+ in some projects,
for example the core libraries in GNOME, but I cannot find any reference
to this out there.  Anyone?
/Simon
    
    
More information about the Gnutls-devel
mailing list