releasing LGPL version of opencdk?

Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmav at
Wed Mar 19 19:28:14 CET 2008

Simon Josefsson wrote:

> Regarding naming, on second thought, I think it would be better to avoid
> having 'gnutls' in the name of the LGPL package since it would be
> confusing if any non-gnutls projects to link with it.
> 'libopencdk-lite'?

I also like the lite version better :)


More information about the Gnutls-devel mailing list