releasing LGPL version of opencdk?

[Simon Josefsson]

Timo Schulz <twoaday at gmx.net> writes:

> Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
>> Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> 
>>> Regarding naming, on second thought, I think it would be better to avoid
>>> having 'gnutls' in the name of the LGPL package since it would be
>>> confusing if any non-gnutls projects to link with it.
>>> 'libopencdk-lite'?
>> 
>> I also like the lite version better :)
>
> I've to agree, that the 'gnutls' part might confuse user.
> So it's settled, we use the 'libopencdk-lite' name :-).

It seems the savannah people do not like project names that contain
'open'...

https://savannah.gnu.org/task/?7859

How do you feel about using 'freecdk'?  This let us avoid the -lite
suffix which is nice.  Or 'minicdk'?

/Simon