gpg 1.4

[Robert J. Hansen]

> Is using gpg 1.4 on an "air-gaped" computer to generate RSA 4096 keys
> and encrypting files/messages to owners of such keys still considered
> safe?

No idea. We're not you. We don't know your threat model, what actors 
you're facing, what environment you're in. GnuPG just provides tools. 
Knowing what to do with it, how, and why, is on you.

Please don't mistake this for a sarcastic answer. It's an honest one. 
There is no way Werner, or anyone, can answer your question without 
first asking a lot of questions. That kind of individualized 
consultation usually costs money.

I will say this: I'm unaware of any reason it would be considered 
unsafe. Whether it would be considered safe is an open question.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 236 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/attachments/20260113/11b93893/attachment-0001.sig>