WKD: conveying intent of encrypt-by-default?
Jacob Bachmeyer
jcb62281 at gmail.com
Tue Oct 4 06:39:04 CEST 2022
Phil Pennock via Gnupg-users wrote:
> [...]
>
> Problem: we use PGP for signing and for certain transactions which need
> high confidentiality, but for the most part, for most of our staff,
> setting up a PGP-capable mail client with our mail-provider is a pain
> and we're not interested. We want the PGP keys _available_ for people
> to have a trusted path to the key, but that does _not_ mean that we want
> people to default to using PGP for all communications with us.
>
Simple option if most users at your site will be generating PGP
signatures but not running PGP-capable MUAs: generate sign-only keys
and put those in WKD. You would need a second mechanism for
distributing the encryption-permitted keys for those users who need
them, but the encryption keys could in turn be signed with the WKD
sign-only keys to prevent a man-in-the-middle attack.
-- Jacob
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list