Why is there a conflict?

[bereska at hotmail.com]

"a at b:c$ gpg -e -b -r Mike data.file" produces the encrypted file 
data.file.sig with the detached signature of data.file
I don't think there's a oneliner for what you're trying to achieve

gpg -er Mike data.file
gpg -b data.file.gpg


17.01.2021 00:56, Ayoub Misherghi via Gnupg-users пишет:
>
> a at b:c$ gpg -e -b -r Mike data.file
>
>
> produced "data.file.sig" and no "data.file.gpg"
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Ayoub
>
>
>
> On 1/16/2021 2:53 AM, Dmitry Gudkov wrote:
>> Just get rid of -s
>>
>> On Jan 16, 2021 12:35, Ayoub Misherghi via Gnupg-users 
>> <gnupg-users at gnupg.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> The intention is to sign and encrypt "data.file" producing a detached 
>> signature file.
>>
>>
>> a at b:c$ gpg -s -e -b -r Mike data.file
>>
>> gpg: conflicting commands
>>
>>
>> Why is there a conflict? I do not want to produce an attached signature.
>>
>>
>> Ayoub
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users at gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/attachments/20210117/91d673c1/attachment.html>