decrypt aes256 encrypted file without gpg-agent

[Fourhundred Thecat]

 > On 2020-06-30 13:27, Ralph Seichter via Gnupg-users wrote:
> * Fourhundred Thecat:
>
>>> Show us a body of your work which proves you have the necessary
>>> skills to critique the GnuPG authors' work. Until you do, your
>>> "judgment" is moot.
>>
>> An idea should be considered on its own merit.
>
> What "idea" would that be, exactly?
>
>> You should counter my criticism with facts, instead of attacking me
>> personally.
>
> I am not attacking you. Read what I wrote in this thread. I just doubt
> that you have enough knowledge about the motivation behind and the inner
> workings of GnuPG to offer your "critique" (which I consider personal
> dislike for certain behaviour) until you convince me otherwise.
>
> Based on what you wrote so far, you are just some random person behind a
> pseudonym. What are your credentials in this field? What qualification
> do you have that would enable you to call the work of other people "bad
> design" with actual justification? Have you designed and maintained
> software on the scale of GnuPG, for decades, with a worldwide user base,
> dealing with security, usability and compatibility issues, having to
> find some compromise between the various aspects?
>
>> You can either reply with counterargument, or ignore my messages in
>> this thread.
>
> You can either tell people why your opinion should matter, or live with
> being called out for not doing so.

We are moving in circles. Looks like you have no real arguments, and
keep repeating same stuff all over again.

I see no benefit for anybody in continuing this discussion.

But thanks to everybody who participated. It helped me to get an idea
about this community.

Cheers,