Slightly OT - i need the proper wording for a signed document

[Dirk Gottschalk]

Hello Stefan.

Am Freitag, den 02.11.2018, 12:53 +0100 schrieb Stefan Claas:
> 
> Hi Wiktor,
> 
> thanks a lot! Now this is awesome... i just timestamped my already
> signed .pdf with Adobe Reader DC and this does not invalidate my
> qualified signature, when saving the document again! :-) I must admit
> i did  not know this.

You mean, you "tampered" with the file and the signature is still
valid? Are you sure? Then Adome does sometging really bad, IMHO.

Such a signature should ensure that the file is unmodified completely.
otherwise somebody can modify it in a way that could be used as a
backdoor to the signature, at least in theory.

Regards,
Dirk

-- 
Dirk Gottschalk
Paulusstrasse 6-8
52064 Aachen, Germany

GPG: DDCB AF8E 0132 AA54 20AB  B864 4081 0B18 1ED8 E838
Keybase.io: https://keybase.io/dgottschalk
GitHub: https://github.com/Dirk1980ac

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/attachments/20181102/5b41282e/attachment.sig>