DRM?
Kristian Fiskerstrand
kristian.fiskerstrand at sumptuouscapital.com
Tue Jan 16 20:08:08 CET 2018
On 01/16/2018 07:50 PM, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> Agreed. I was thinking more along the lines of having some method of
> causing signature vandalism to expire.
They don't really constitute an issue either for security or privacy,
though. If looking at keyserver directly (which you really shouldn't do,
your client will filter unknown keys and actually verify the rest) you
will see all kinds of interesting things like the Christmas present of
["funny sks"] on my keyblock some years ago. But it doesn't constitute
an *issue* when OpenPGP is used correctly.
References:
["funny sks"]
https://sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x94CBAFDD30345109561835AA0B7F8B60E3EDFAE3
--
----------------------------
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Blog: https://blog.sumptuouscapital.com
Twitter: @krifisk
----------------------------
Public OpenPGP keyblock at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
----------------------------
"A committee is a group that keeps minutes and loses hours."
(Milton Berle)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/attachments/20180116/94fea060/attachment.sig>
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list