Garbled data in keyservers

[Stefan Claas]

On Sun, 09 Dec 2018 20:55:36 +0100, Dirk Gottschalk wrote:

Hello Dirk,

> That I mentioned in the other reply I have sent a few seconds ago.
> 
> > right? A key which would bear a CA sig would imho not have such
> > additional and funny UID's or sigs, because it would make the key
> > owner look a bit stupid, i would say.  
> 
> No. The signatures on a key are nor related to each other. A funni
> signature could be backdated before the signature by the CA were made.
> Who's the stupid now, in the eyes of the user seeing this? ^^

Do you really think a user with a CA sig would do that, with my
proposals i have made?

Regards
Stefan

-- 
https://www.behance.net/futagoza
https://keybase.io/stefan_claas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/attachments/20181209/b717049d/attachment.sig>