E-mail with deniable authentication

[Mario Castelán Castro]

Good point.

Note: You forgot to reply to list.

On 02/09/17 22:11, Lachlan Gunn wrote:
> Le 2017-09-03 à 11:48, Mario Castelán Castro a écrit :
>> I am well aware of that. Although deniable encryption is not a panacea
>> it is an improvement. It gives less power to the correspondent to blackmail.
> 
> I would also add that lots of servers will put a DKIM signature onto the
> email, thus showing who sent the ciphertext to whom.  Obviously this
> isn't as secure as a personal digital signature, since anyone who can
> get into your email account can send email in your name, but it does
> mean that email nowdays is at least somewhat non-repudiable.

-- 
Do not eat animals; respect them as you respect people.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=how+to+(become+OR+eat)+vegan

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20170905/2da2bb20/attachment.sig>