1024 key with large sub key

[Robert J. Hansen]

> But in terms of being willing to make changes to the GnuPG option space
> that break backward compatibility for some users in order to improve the
> overall state of GnuPG crypto, removing --enable-large-rsa isn't
> anywhere *close* to the top of my list.

It's fine if it's not at the top of the list; but is there any
compelling reason to not put it on the list?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 821 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20171002/1c796d04/attachment.sig>