? Comments re key servers? re gpg-encrypted mail? re key servers carry many phony keys?

[Miroslav Rovis]

I also see the kind reply by Anthony at:
https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2017-January/057584.html
but it's not yet in my mailbox...

I must go to sleep, so I opened this issue with the repo:
PGP key not on (usual) keyservers #143
https://github.com/Synzvato/decentraleyes/issues/143

( BTW, looks like a fine addon. For Palemoon, but of course for Firefox as
well, if people haven't yet switched. )

On 170131-00:42+0100, Miroslav Rovis wrote:
> I'm reviving this end-of-last-year thread, because...
> It's this repo, where the latest two tags are PGP-signed:
> https://github.com/Synzvato/decentraleyes/tags
> 
> They are signed with the key below, and no matter how I tried:
> 
> gpg --keyserver hkp://pgp.mit.edu --recv-key CECC45E1E979013C
> gpg --keyserver hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-key CECC45E1E979013C 
> 

Good night!

-- 
Miroslav Rovis
Zagreb, Croatia
http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20170131/617f4fa5/attachment-0001.sig>