Failure of comparison of valid pub key's .asc files

[JB]

J B <jb.1234abcd <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Note the difference in output from 'gpg --check-sigs C65285EC':
> case 1.
> gpg: 1 signature not checked due to a missing key
> case 2.
> gpg: 2 signatures not checked due to missing keys

Please disregard the above warning note - I received the missing keys from
key servers and verified the signatures.

Some additional data:

pgp.mit.edu lookup result:
Search results for 'trava90'

Type bits/keyID     Date       User ID

pub  2048R/C65285EC 2015-03-15 trava90 <travawine at protonmail.com>
	 Fingerprint=439F 46F4 2C6A E3D2 3CF5  2E70 865E 6C87 C652 85EC 

sks-keyservers.net lookup result:
Search results for 'trava90'

Type bits/keyID     cr. time   exp time   key expir

pub  2048R/C65285EC 2015-03-15            
	 Fingerprint=439F 46F4 2C6A E3D2 3CF5  2E70 865E 6C87 C652 85EC 

uid trava90 <travawine at protonmail.com>
sig  sig3  C65285EC 2015-03-15 __________ __________ [selfsig]
sig  sig3  8FCF9CEC 2015-05-16 __________ __________ Moonchild (RSA signing
key) <moonchild at palemoon.org>
sig  sig3  6DA5F2AC 2015-11-15 __________ __________ Moonchild (E-mail
signing key) <moonchild at palemoon.org>

sub  2048R/25192F9F 2015-03-15            
sig sbind  C65285EC 2015-03-15 __________ __________ []

My question is:
Can I have a pub key with a unique id C65285EC and a fingerprint, but two
different associated (gpg --export) ascii .asc or binary .gpg files ?

jb