A problem in the web of trust model or a gnupg bug?

Andrea Dari andreadari91 at gmail.com
Fri Feb 19 19:47:28 CET 2016


Nop I didn't, now it works!

This time gpg didn't run that command by itself.

Thanks Ingo

Andrea

2016-02-19 19:20 GMT+01:00 Ingo Klöcker <kloecker at kde.org>:

> On Friday 19 February 2016 15:12:34 Andrea Dari wrote:
> > 1) This is the general situation:
> >
> > http://pastebin.com/NXuJj2h5
> >
> > User one is the user that i fully trust and has a revocation dated on
> > 18 February 2016
> >
> > 2) Here you can see User one pbkey details:
> >
> > http://pastebin.com/g2tQKzPN
> >
> > 3) Here you can see that user three is treated with validity = full
> > even if it is signed after the revocation of User one key.
> >
> > http://pastebin.com/EEGXcNa2
> >
> > Fortunately, this is not a real situation, but I tested it to
> > understand what happened in this cases; because i wasn't able to find
> > any documentation about it.
>
> Did you run "gpg --check-trustdb" after you revoked the key of User one?
>
>
> Regards,
> Ingo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users at gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20160219/999fb770/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list