Hybrid keysigning party, your opinion?

[Robert J. Hansen]

> Or you might not because it was based on a stupid thinking error on my
> side. Let's make it "a chance of 1 in 2^128", which could be the chance
> of you trying a symmetric encryption key and actually being right about it.

I'm glad you made the correction: that error was sooooo profound.  :)


(For those not up on their large-number theory: the difference is
insignificant.  Peter's correction was made in a spirit of utterly
pedantic attention to detail [a spirit I share!], not because it mattered.)