Unsubscribe me please

[Pete Stephenson]

Hi Lynda,

Unfortunately, that's not how it works. Essentially all of us are just
users and can't unsubscribe you. Instead, your message was sent to the
entire mailing list.

Thankfully, the self-service process is straightforward: if you wish to
unsubscribe, just click the link at the bottom of every message sent to the
list and follow the directions to unsubscribe.

Cheers!
-Pete

On Aug 24, 2016 18:51, "lynda.harlos at sympatico.ca" <
lynda.harlos at sympatico.ca> wrote:

> I have contacted you several times to unsubscribe me please.
>
>
>
>   
> *Lynda Harlos*
> Home based travel agent
>
> Orion Travelinx
>
> Home office: 905-433-4267
>
> Text: 905-723-9210
>
> www.facebook.com/TravelAgent.LyndaHarlos
>
>
>
> Referrals are the best compliment!
>
> Any price/s quoted not guaranteed until payment is made
>
> To unsubscribe please reply with unsubscribe in subject line
> *-------Original Message-------*
>
> *From:* martin <martini5468 at gmail.com>
> *Date:* 8/24/2016 12:32:12 PM
> *To:* gnupg-users at gnupg.org
> *Subject:* Re: Attacks on encrypted communicxatiopn rising in Europe
>
> On 24/08/16 15:37, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> > I find the current state of detente to be pretty good, actually.  We're
> > allowed to design the best systems we can, and governments are allowed
> > to discover where we're not as clever as we think we are.  If there's a
> > flaw in Tor and the FBI uses it to pierce anonymity and go after a bad
> > guy, I can get behind that.  Way to go, FBI, you did it right, now
> > please hold on while we figure out how you did this and write a patch to
> > keep you from doing it again.
> >
> > I guess you could say my preferred solution to the crypto wars is to
> > encourage an ongoing escalating crypto arms race.  It's crazy, but it
> > seems to work.
>
> For my €0.02 I think the above is mostly valid bar 2 small details:
>
> 1. Seldom we do find the FBI breaking security of anonymity tools. Only
> if a high profile case shows up or someone leaks it. I think it is even
> more rare for the FBI to outright disclose the vulnerability they used
> so it can be patched. I don't even know if the other 3 letter agencies
> do it.
>
> 2. Crypto arms race also implies stock piling vulnerabilities -
> something Bruce Schneier is very vocal about [1][2]. I think the answer
> here is to find a balance of some sort - i.e. keep vulnerabilities in
> rare cases for short periods of time and then disclose and patch them.
> However for that to work we need to trust the govt. to do the right
> thing. Which I think is pretty much the core issue that started this
> discussion.
>
> Regards,
> Martin
>
> [1] Hacking Team, Computer Vulnerabilities, and the NSA -
> https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2015/09/hacking_team_co.html
> [2] Disclosing vs. Hoarding Vulnerabilities -
> https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2014/05/disclosing_vs_h.html
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users at gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users at gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20160824/705e256f/attachment-0001.html>