"gpg --with-fingerprint $FILE" is not listing the keyfingerprint in some cases

[Aaron Toponce]

On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:30:21PM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
> Looks like a bug.  Note that on each of the keys that didn't work there is a
> direct signature on the key.  This is not very common, and is usually used
> for a designated revoker (i.e. "I permit so-and-so to revoke my key for me").
> I suspect there is a bug printing the fingerprints on a key from a key file
> (rather than from a keyring) for keys with a direct signature.

Ah. Interesting. Should I file a proper bug against GnuPG then?

-- 
. o .   o . o   . . o   o . .   . o .
. . o   . o o   o . o   . o o   . . o
o o o   . o .   . o o   o o .   o o o
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 519 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20140514/4965e527/attachment.sig>