UI terminology for calculated validities

[MFPA]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi


On Tuesday 29 April 2014 at 8:34:27 PM, in
<mid:1495086.yRroNSC0aI at inno>, Hauke Laging wrote:


> Am Di 29.04.2014, 20:22:52 schrieb MFPA:
>> But unless I am missing something, "trust: ultimate"
>> is the only way the trust command can validate a key
>> without removing validity from all the keys on the
>> keyring that are validated by signatures.

> I don't understand that.

The selection of "trust-model direct" tells your copy of GNUPG to
ignore signatures, and thereby removes validity from all the keys on
the keyring that are validated by signatures.

"Trust: ultimate" validates a key whatever "trust-model" is in
operation, (but also allows whoever controls that key to tell your
copy of GnuPG what keys to accept).

"Trust:" followed by any other option except "ultimate"
appears to have no effect unless the "trust-model direct" is in
operation.

Have I got this right?


- --
Best regards

MFPA                    mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net

I hit the CTRL key but I'm still not in control!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iPQEAQEKAF4FAlNgNN5XFIAAAAAALgAgaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl
bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJBMjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0
N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5pLXsD/36Wj4oVmagdywJZhmWukGCJ/ys+mH9ImjgT
Zgy4h7c062auYqFfaTN6ScBZqxGZDuso6PnZAi+4iyCgkk3HAUHBBT2RGE6/jnBy
qTAf5/ZiZtJzt4p8q/wOsBsdNTPxkPvY1HLJbJJl9BH/U7NW38hnCuQViyb+rXEF
p5NIiPWR
=acCn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----