UI terminology for calculated validities
Bernard Tyers
ei8fdb at ei8fdb.org
Fri Apr 25 19:43:53 CEST 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 25/04/2014 18:02, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 04/25/2014 09:23 AM, Mark H. Wood wrote:
>> What about abandoning terms of art and just saying things more
>> simply: "This message was signed by key AAAAAAAA. You have
>> indicated that you trust that key."
>
> trust that key to do what? to belong to some mystery person? to
> make valid OpenPGP signatures? to send you good stock tips? to be
> a reliable source of cryptographically-signed tasty noodle
> casserole recipes? to be controlled in an operationally secure
> fashion? to have been created on the date it claims to have been
> created?
>
> we're all aiming for clarity and simplicity here, but using a
> simple ambiguous term when we need to distinguish at least two very
> specific cases from each other and from many other meanings of the
> word "trust" seems like a recipe for failure (instead of noodle
> casserole).
>
> --dkg
Hi all,
Nicolai: I am very glad you've started this thread.
<dons flame retardant suit>
At the risk of being flamed, can I suggest asking the users what they
think?
Nicolai, by the look of it you've carried out some user research. I
guess so by the "real world" discussion you posted in a message.
If you did can I ask what you focused on? Did you look for suggestions
from users?
I have read some HCI research into non-expert user understanding of PGP.
If there wasn't user research done, can I suggest doing some?
With the utmost respect to the list members, you (we) are not
non-expert users, and so our opinions really don't matter.
The focus of Nicolai's question is *non-expert*, so we need to get
their opinions.
Suggestions? Arguments?
Bernard
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=SHCp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list