Use of two private/public key pairs, Sign only and Encrypt only
    Hauke Laging 
    mailinglisten at hauke-laging.de
       
    Fri Sep 27 16:20:01 CEST 2013
    
    
  
Am Fr 27.09.2013, 09:56:03 schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
> What's worse is that
> revoking your key could be seen as tipping off your correspondents to
> the police's activities, and that's a serious offense under RIPA.
Is that your interpretation or in any way official? My respective search 
engige efforts were not successful.
This point of view would have quite strange consequences: For how long shall 
you be forced to keep a key? Even longer than before (if you change subkeys 
regularly)? Why should you have to accept that police can read future data of 
yours, data which they do not have a warrant for?
Unfortunately for quite a while we have seen that there is a lot more between 
UK and the rest of (continental) Europe than just water. Maybe we will finally 
see the EU shrink for the first time.
Hauke
-- 
Crypto für alle: http://www.openpgp-schulungen.de/fuer/bekannte/
OpenPGP: 7D82 FB9F D25A 2CE4 5241 6C37 BF4B 8EEF 1A57 1DF5
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 572 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20130927/a7a68c46/attachment.sig>
    
    
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list