GPG weakness

[Robert Holtzman]

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 02:59:17PM +0200, Manu García wrote:

           ........snip........
> 
> I always thought that GnuPG was rather secure, but it seems that among
> experts it's a well known weak and poor ciphering technology which no
> security experts consider seriously. At least that's the impression I get
> reading said article.

I saw nothing in the article to support this paragraph. You're drawing
conclusions out of thin air. 


-- 
Bob Holtzman
Your mail is being read by tight lipped 
Homeland Security agents who fail to see
the humor in Doctor Strangelove 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20130725/72d19536/attachment.sig>