old vs new gnupg - encrypting files
Hauke Laging
mailinglisten at hauke-laging.de
Thu Jul 26 00:48:06 CEST 2012
Am Mi 25.07.2012, 17:17:15 schrieb Chris Clifton:
> Where xxx is the problematic key and YYY is our key, and I was able to
> decrypt the file using my private key with no problems.
Do the same on the other system and have a look at the resulting encrypted
files via
gpg -v --list-packets filename.dat.pgp
and check for differences in the outputs. I don't have a real idea yet what
could be the problem but perhaps we are lucky with this general checking.
Hauke
--
PGP: D44C 6A5B 71B0 427C CED3 025C BD7D 6D27 ECCB 5814
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 555 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20120726/f44727ea/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list