STEED - Usable end-to-end encryption
Robert Holtzman
holtzm at cox.net
Tue Oct 18 20:50:35 CEST 2011
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 05:50:42PM -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote:
.........snip..........
>
> At any rate, I would love to see more client-to-client encryption in email.
> I've always wondered if there could be an "OTR" approach to mail, somehow,
> so people don't need to generate and manage their own sets of keys, as that
> seems to be the largest hinderence to widespread adoption.
> the user should do, is compose the mail, hit send, and everything is
Not true. The greatest hindrance to widespread adoption is the phrase I
often hear..."I've got nothing to hide" It drives me up a wall.
> _______________________________________________
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users at gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
--
Bob Holtzman
If you think you're getting free lunch,
check the price of the beer.
Key ID: 8D549279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20111018/cf4ac8cb/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list