Gpg4Win 2.0.4 with GnuPG 1.4.11??

[MFPA]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi


On Saturday 20 November 2010 at 11:24:41 PM, in
<mid:20101120182441.22a717b8 at scorpio>, Jerry wrote:



> This is a snippet of the header from the post in
> question:

> From: MFPA <expires2010 at ymail.com>
> To: "Jerry on GnuPG-Users" <gnupg-users at gnupg.org>
> CC: "Jerry" <gnupg.user at seibercom.net>
> Subject: Re: Gpg4Win 2.0.4 with GnuPG 1.4.11??
> Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:56:03 +0000
> Reply-To: MFPA <expires2010 at ymail.com>
> X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.38) Professional

Same format as any other posting I make to this list (except a thread
starter). All taken care of automatically by message templates.

And only differing from other lists I inhabit in two respects: this is
the only list I post to that requires a "CC" to the previous poster,
and the only one that doesn't reset the "Reply-To" header to the list
address.


> I have just created a rule that will send any Cc: from that user to the
> bit bucket.

Fair enough. I only offered a plausible answer to your musing as to
why the thread starter considered the latest GnuPG 2.0.x version to be
"unstable." It's beyond me why that shouls upset you so much. (-:


- --
Best regards

MFPA                    mailto:expires2010 at ymail.com

I hit the CTRL key but I'm still not in control!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQCVAwUBTOh6MqipC46tDG5pAQrzyQQAiSv7n+LtoEUIX/dOPLhFdeFPj1Jrzmbu
W9eCOJGT13IUsxNDzwRgoR4P6Cify881wXRtiAN6NOEjCHqDNmOXOa2pJvro30Ug
rR9GsOZj7Y//OdW91KNk4yGo3UYLkuDOZCJihwNGnbj+/h+hgdJ5xAdt2v1Q+7f4
riEzhcPAMd4=
=0mJz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----