key question
MFPA
expires2010 at ymail.com
Fri Feb 26 22:10:41 CET 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Friday 26 February 2010 at 8:39:07 PM, in
<mid:97334E1F-BA6F-403E-83EB-51DAEE32FF63 at jabberwocky.com>, David Shaw
wrote:
> On Feb 26, 2010, at 3:37 PM, Grant Olson wrote:
>>> Alas, while GnuPG supports the flag, no keyserver
>>> does.
>>> David
>> Just curious... Does support just mean it sets the
>> bit? Or will it turn an attempt to --send-keys on
>> that key into a no-op?
> Support means it gives the user the ability to set and
> clear the bit (it is set by default).
Would there not be some merit in honouring the flag by (at least)
giving an extra warning to answer if you execute --send-keys to upload
a key with that bit set?
- --
Best regards
MFPA mailto:expires2010 at ymail.com
Don't anthropomorphize computers - they hate it
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQCVAwUBS4g42aipC46tDG5pAQpbhgP/UR/YSCW6ns0SZbrSBaiHVppLI2tZLg2D
iGLChDodKWh/OI93e6wlZlxtgDv5ZywdzXcM+8yehCNiW4ifmaHnpA9NAMlYcS/u
Uuw5aG/CE1uhnLsnbwX8QzSvUBsaMaLm0oJZRq+2LyippQu/27L4PvS8f1oWKXnp
1eX02sMESpY=
=eGNU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list