best practices

[Faramir]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

El 14-12-2010 15:23, David Shaw escribió:
...
> There is a weak safety factor argument, too.  If it turns out that (for example) AES-256 isn't as strong as expected, it may well be that AES-256 is actually a good match to RSA-2048, and you were wise to use it instead of AES-128 (which given the same imaginary attack would be weaker than RSA-2048).  You sort of need a crystal ball to make that argument though...

  I wish I had read that message before writing my last reply XD

  I know I asked before, but I can't remember if I saw an answer. Is
TwoFish implementation the 256 bit key version?

  Best Regards
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJNCAE6AAoJEMV4f6PvczxAtqIH/3a+8kwHqB9WuHDScknpwx+M
PCaquhrAoSKbZP06NG/+BH7wq4ChDBz2TLAy0MyUDdu9pb7uQWbu2btppubzxJBB
/zJ81qPBg/n1nBLlQ98UMYgIihxriuf+tC4x3JL7t0MhRrt/UaYEZwjdW/Xk1mRn
hJKZOiZdaGU23OcIVB4kcQIOo+yUYUatWIgsQDQSKJ2CGAxiWObW1hAaTMh/ZFa+
ppsfB859ULz4mXd85zsOqzrDMQaMRMCZmhJwLmODjspiQb1p5dl5K85PGDVnIt5F
shEqgctt3FxEWr4XvLwfrOm+kUwqijxbunWXT5XHqAIher6GwyKFR918A8+bkEE=
=ZJ7N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----